Self-Awareness and the Hidden Cost of Performance
Strong results don't always tell us what it takes to produce them. Self-awareness may help us recognize when performance comes at the expense of learning and enjoyment.
I've long believed that self-awareness may be the performance currency that trumps all others. It's a provocative claim, and one I've been interested in examining more carefully.
Organizations invest considerable resources in developing people's skills, knowledge, and capabilities. Yet possessing capability and being able to use it effectively are two different things. Our attention, assumptions, habits, and working conditions all influence what we're able to contribute.
Tim Gallwey's Inner Game formulation, Performance = Potential − Interference, has long shaped my thinking about this distinction. It invites us to examine what may be preventing people from making full use of their capabilities.
The research offers some important qualifications.
In a widely cited meta-analysis, Kluger and DeNisi found that although feedback improved performance on average, more than one-third of the effects they examined were negative. Their work suggests that where feedback directs our attention matters. When attention shifts toward judging ourselves rather than engaging with the task, feedback can become another source of interference.
But there's another dimension of performance that deserves our attention.
Someone can continue producing excellent results while becoming increasingly exhausted by the effort required. They may be relying on familiar capabilities without learning anything new, or gradually losing the enjoyment they once found in their work. Their performance measures may remain strong even as the conditions needed to sustain those results deteriorate.
This raises a question that conventional performance measurement may not adequately address: How sustainable is the way we're achieving our results?
In a new Work Reframe research paper, Self-Awareness: The Performance Currency That Trumps All Others?, I examine research on awareness, attention, feedback, learning, and the conditions that shape our ability to perform.
The paper also explores a practical sequence—Awareness → Understanding → Agency—and considers why performance, learning, and enjoyment deserve attention together.
The research doesn't establish self-awareness as our single most valuable performance capability. What it suggests is that awareness may help us recognize when our capabilities are being constrained, when our assumptions deserve examination, and when strong results are being achieved at a cost we haven't fully considered.
Read the Work Reframe White Paper: Self-Awareness — The Performance Currency That Trumps All Others?
Perhaps the greater value of self-awareness is that it helps us understand not only whether we're succeeding, but whether the way we're working allows that success to continue.